Since 2001, we've posted 21,201 different business opportunities and ideas, so you're sure to find something here to inspire you!
New York Times Bans The Word “Tweet”
The Slate is reporting that the Gray Lady will no longer tweet. That’s according to the New York Times’ standards editor Phil Corbett, who is pleading with writers to avoid using the word in their copy whenever possible, invoking the paper’s disdain for “colloquialisms, neologisms and jargon.”
There are tweet partisans: The Associated Press gave tweet its blessing in the most recent edition of its style guide, and the American Dialect Society listed tweet as its “word of the year” for 2009 (though that label is less an honorific than a reflection of widespread use).
Corbett suggests replacing tweet with chirp. He also proposes the following “deft, English alternatives”:
use Twitter, post to or on Twitter, write on Twitter, a Twitter message, a Twitter update. Or, once you’ve established that Twitter is the medium, simply use “say” or “write.”Photo by HolyKaw.
Related Businesses in the Directory
Related Posts
Related Resources















Collier Ward on June 11th, 2010 10:28 pm
My daughters dog’s name is Neologism (“Neo” for short).
How dare the Times have “disdain for… neologisms”!
Angela Shupe on June 13th, 2010 6:11 pm
What’s their problem with the word “tweet”? English isn’t a dead language, so what’s the point of fighting something that has obviously taken root? Or are they simply mad that they didn’t come up with it first?
Leave a Reply